|
|
Yes |
No |
To some degree |
Don't know |
| 1. |
Does the institution's mission statement clearly identify its priorities and unique characteristics? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 2a. |
Do administrators, faculty and staff members believe in and support the statement? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 2b. |
Were they actively involved in its development? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 3. |
Do individual units or departments have clearly articulated mission statements that identify their specific priorities? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 4. |
Do such statements mesh with and support the institutional mission statement? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 5a. |
Do the members of the unit support its mission statement? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 5b. |
Were they involved in its development? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 6a. |
Are the priorities of the institution and the department understood by new faculty members? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 6b. |
Are the priorities clearly articulated at every point in the hiring process? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 7a. |
Are units evaluated on how well they meet the specific goals defined in their mission statement? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 7b. |
Are resources and awards allocated accordingly? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 8a. |
Does the faculty reward system (promotion, tenure, and merit pay) actively support the articulated mission statements of the institution and of the units in which faculty work? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 8b. |
Is good teaching important in the equation? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 8c. |
Are there clearly defined requirements for determining good teaching? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 9a. |
Do faculty members understand the criteria by which they will be judged? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 9b. |
Are they assisted in preparing the necessary documentation of their work? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 9c. |
Are they provided with a clear statement addressing faculty rewards procedures, requirements, and criteria? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 10. |
Is there a mentoring system for new faculty members? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 11. |
Is the faculty reward system sensitive to the differences among the disciplines? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 12. |
Is the faculty reward system sensitive to the differences in the strengths of individual faculty members? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 13. |
Is the faculty reward system sensitive to the differences in departments? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 14. |
In the faculty reward system, are the weights given to the same activity different among individual faculty members? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 15. |
In the faculty reward system, are the weights given to the same activity different among units? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 16. |
Does the system recognize the range of important activities that faculty in specific units perform? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 17. |
Does the system allow individual faculty reward criteria to be modified based on assignment? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 18. |
Do faculty members and unit heads consider the evaluation process fair? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 19a. |
Are data provided to faculty members throughout their careers to help them identify areas of strength and those in need of improvement? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 19b. |
Is a formal procedure in place to provide assistance and support when needed? |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| 20 |
Do faculty members who are assigned specific instructional or service projects (curriculum design, community support), receive guidance about how these activities will be reviewed and recognized within the faculty reward system? |
. |
. |
. |
. |