The National Academy for Academic Leadership
Leadership that Transforms Learning

Institutional Priorities and Faculty Rewards: An Administrative Checklist
The Faculty Reward System

Yes No To some degree Don't know
1. Does the institution's mission statement clearly identify its priorities and unique characteristics? . . . .
2a. Do administrators, faculty and staff members believe in and support the statement? . . . .
2b. Were they actively involved in its development? . . . .
3. Do individual units or departments have clearly articulated mission statements that identify their specific priorities? . . . .
4. Do such statements mesh with and support the institutional mission statement? . . . .
5a. Do the members of the unit support its mission statement? . . . .
5b. Were they involved in its development? . . . .
6a. Are the priorities of the institution and the department understood by new faculty members? . . . .
6b. Are the priorities clearly articulated at every point in the hiring process? . . . .
7a. Are units evaluated on how well they meet the specific goals defined in their mission statement? . . . .
7b. Are resources and awards allocated accordingly? . . . .
8a. Does the faculty reward system (promotion, tenure, and merit pay) actively support the articulated mission statements of the institution and of the units in which faculty work? . . . .
8b. Is good teaching important in the equation? . . . .
8c. Are there clearly defined requirements for determining good teaching? . . . .
9a. Do faculty members understand the criteria by which they will be judged? . . . .
9b. Are they assisted in preparing the necessary documentation of their work? . . . .
9c. Are they provided with a clear statement addressing faculty rewards procedures, requirements, and criteria? . . . .
10. Is there a mentoring system for new faculty members? . . . .
11. Is the faculty reward system sensitive to the differences among the disciplines? . . . .
12. Is the faculty reward system sensitive to the differences in the strengths of individual faculty members? . . . .
13. Is the faculty reward system sensitive to the differences in departments? . . . .
14. In the faculty reward system, are the weights given to the same activity different among individual faculty members? . . . .
15. In the faculty reward system, are the weights given to the same activity different among units? . . . .
16. Does the system recognize the range of important activities that faculty in specific units perform? . . . .
17. Does the system allow individual faculty reward criteria to be modified based on assignment? . . . .
18. Do faculty members and unit heads consider the evaluation process fair? . . . .
19a. Are data provided to faculty members throughout their careers to help them identify areas of strength and those in need of improvement? . . . .
19b. Is a formal procedure in place to provide assistance and support when needed? . . . .
20 Do faculty members who are assigned specific instructional or service projects (curriculum design, community support), receive guidance about how these activities will be reviewed and recognized within the faculty reward system? . . . .

Back to Guidelines